In Search Of Schrodinger's Cat: Updated Edition

Product Information

Elon Musk: "Reading the source material is better than reading other people's opinions about the source material." A subtle problem with this book seemed to me it's a little dated. Still, this is an enlightening launch pad for adventuring in the quantized unknown. Philosophically, the issue reminds me of how we think about infinitely small quantities. Do infinitesimals exist? Amidst a plethora of books purportedly dealing with "explaining Quantum Theory to the layman" this book stands apart, as well as taller, by virtue of two qualities: - It is typical of these cases that an indeterminacy originally restricted to the atomic domain becomes transformed into macroscopic indeterminacy, which can then be resolved by direct observation. That prevents us from so naively accepting as valid a "blurred model" for representing reality. In itself, it would not embody anything unclear or contradictory. There is a difference between a shaky or out-of-focus photograph and a snapshot of clouds and fog banks.

Loading interface - Goodreads

Si bien mucha agua ha pasado por el río de la física contemporánea desde el tiempo en el que el texto fue escrito (finales de los 80) los temas y las discusiones tienen una actualidad pasmosa que demuestra lo poco que realmente hemos avanzado en la comprensión de la teoría cuántica. Naturalmente la teoría cuántica moderna ha evolucionado, especialmente en las técnicas para su aplicación, en los sistemas a los que se aplica y en su poderoso rol en la tecnología, pero los problemas de fondo, las preguntas de fondo de las que se ocupa este librito siguen teniendo todavía mucha actualidad.

References

It's unapologetically forthcoming, and NEVER tries to dumb down things in an effort towards becoming more "accommodating" and "plebian", which are the more euphemistic expressions for undervaluing the readers.

Learning Gotcha: How We Misunderstood Schrödinger’s Cat Learning Gotcha: How We Misunderstood Schrödinger’s Cat

According to the first of them, Copenhagen interpretations, Chance plays the chancellor or Chairman. Nevertheless, if you want to get acquainted with the strange & beautiful world of quantum theory, this is indeed the best introduction that you can procure. Analogy: Just because a camera is out of focus doesn't mean things in the world are actually blurry

John R. Gribbin is a British science writer, an astrophysicist, and a visiting fellow in astronomy at the University of Sussex. The topical range of his prolific writings includes quantum physics, biographies of famous scientists, human evolution, the origins of the universe, climate change and global warming. His also writes science fiction. It's really really well written, even by the high standards of popular science set by the luminaries, and remains deliciously readable even after more than three decades since its publication. Una de las cosas que más disfruto de la divulgación en mi área (en la que supuestamente tengo una formación rigurosa en las técnicas y los conceptos fundamentales) son los detalles históricos sobre como surgieron y se desarrollaron las ideas. My companion looked pained. "I am much better than that grinning idiot from a stupid children's book, I'll have you know."

I was a bit uneasy. Needless to say, talking cats appearing out of nowhere and speaking in riddles was not usual in my daily routine. I started eyeing my Stephen King collection uneasily. "Who are you?" I asked. Both events happened, but we don't know which alternate universe we're in. Maybe every possible outcome creates a new timeline. (I flip a coin and put it under my hand. Are we in a spooky quantum state?) If that's the case, create a scenario where subatomic bluriness determines the fate of a macroscopic object Wikipedia Article on Schrödinger's Cat - Wikipedia is difficult to learn things from, but has great lists of references What is the crossover point between undetectable and detectable, blurry and certain? When does quantum behavior disappear in favor of the everyday, macroscopic reality we're used to? Can we "chain together" reality so tiny behaviors determine larger ones? That's the direct question Schrödinger's Cat raises.In 2006, Gribbin took part in a BBC radio 4 broadcast as an "expert witness". Presenter Matthew Parris discussed with Professor Kathy Sykes and Gribbin whether Einstein "really was a 'crazy genius' ". Also it was interesting finally to find out what stands behind the overused metaphor of Schrodinger's cat:-) You are the only contemporary physicist, besides Laue, who sees that one cannot get around the assumption of reality, if only one is honest. Most of them simply do not see what sort of risky game they are playing with reality—reality as something independent of what is experimentally established. Their interpretation is, however, refuted most elegantly by your system of radioactive atom + amplifier + charge of gunpowder + cat in a box, in which the psi-function of the system contains both the cat alive and blown to bits. Nobody really doubts that the presence or absence of the cat is something independent of the act of observation. The only reasonable explanation for this, says Deutsch, is that the superposition actually represents 256 different computers operating in 256 different parallel universes…”the fact that quantum computing works proves that many worlds exist.” John Gribbin graduated with his bachelor's degree in physics from the University of Sussex in 1966. Gribbin then earned his master of science (M.Sc.) degree in astronomy in 1967, also from the Univ. of Sussex, and he earned his Ph.D. in astrophysics from the University of Cambridge (1971).

As an incurable optimist it is the interpretation of quantum mechanics that appeals most to me. All things are possible. And by our actions we choose our own paths through the many worlds of the quantum...one of the anecdotes told and retold about Niels Bohr is that when someone came to him with a wild idea purporting to resolve one of the puzzles of quantum theory in the 1920’s he replied, “Your theory is crazy. But it’s not crazy enough to be true.”” this book explains generally the perplexing, mind-boggling, paradoxical principles of quantum physics while relating the history of discoveries leading up to and through it, including the discovery of the X-Ray. Current Google Definition - Note it doesn't say the argument was meant as a criticism against quantum mechanics If you asked an intelligent well-read but non-scientific person to summarise the most important contributions of science to our present lives and suggest the possible benefits or hazards of scientific progress in the near future, you’d surely be given a list that included:This implies that the cat or anything in the box is a wave function accompanied by myriad ghost realities that will collapse into a single reality (dead or alive cat) when you decide to see it. Till then it is undead.